In controversy, once again. It seems that the ESPN journalistDavid Faitelsonalready liked to generate controversy with his statements and, once again, he is in the eye of the hurricane after saying that it was a red card for Sebastian Jurado.
And it is that several experts have described as a serious error the one that Fernando Hernandez has determined to expel Jury and marked penalty in the duel between Blue Cross Y Tolucaafter the VAR intervened.
It was on Twitter that Faitelson He wrote that the VAR and the central referee were making the best decision, since it was a clear move of aggression, so the measures were well taken.
“I see a clear aggression from Sebastián Jurado and a well-marked penalty. This time, the referee and the VAR are correct,” the journalist wrote. What generated that Faust Pintoformer of Blue Cross will react
“Again showing that you never played soccer, dear David”, to which in another tweet, David He replied that he had seen the play many times and that it does seem to him that Jurado stretches his leg too much, an unnatural movement.
“I have seen the move 18 times: Sebastián Jurado lengthens his leg as he falls. There is an unnatural movement within the fall of it. Impossible to ensure that it was not an attack. Everything is left to interpretation. For you it was not, for me it was.
For now, the Disciplinary Commission It is already investigating the action and will announce its resolution after it analyzes said controversial move with determination.